From mbak at fxnet.hu Tue Jul 5 05:27:23 2005 From: mbak at fxnet.hu (Mikael Bak) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] perl-quota Message-ID: <1120559243.3337.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi list, I needed this one, so I made an rpm. In case someone else is interested: http://miba.fxnet.hu/tinysofa/ Oh... I should mention that I still use TCS1.1, so perhaps for TCS2.0 perhaps rebuilding the srpm is neccessary. Cheers, Mikael From kenoch20 at yahoo.com Wed Jul 13 13:10:21 2005 From: kenoch20 at yahoo.com (Enoch Asante) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] apache/php configuration Message-ID: <20050713181021.64267.qmail@web51911.mail.yahoo.com> hello Guys, Good work done.i have my classic 2 server running,but with a few problems. 1.After installing greenstone digital library and running this is what i got: You don't have permission to access /gsdl/cgi-bin/library on this server. 403 Forbidden. even though it has work on Fedora 2.with the same configuration.I didnt enable any of the security features. 2.When i tried to run Achievo,the PIM software,this is the result: error: [@14:06:45h] [2] session_start() [function.session-start]: open(/var/lib/php/session/sess_fb3j469f85pu13nk22ca9hgbg3, O_RDWR) failed: Permission denied (13) in /srv/www/html/achievo/atk/session/class.atksessionmanager.inc (line 17). This has aslo worked on FC2 and is working on Uniserver3.2.Apart from these all the other apache/php/mysql works well. what could be the problem. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From mbak at fxnet.hu Mon Jul 18 03:41:58 2005 From: mbak at fxnet.hu (Mikael Bak) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] clamav in 1.1 contrib Message-ID: <1121676117.3336.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi list, Is there a reason why clamav in contrib is only up to date for v2.0 of classic? I know I can build and install my own, but I still wanted to know why it isn't "supported" anymore. Clamav 0.86.1 has been out since June 23rd. TIA, Mikael From gda at tinysofa.org Mon Jul 18 04:00:47 2005 From: gda at tinysofa.org (Gerald Dachs) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] clamav in 1.1 contrib In-Reply-To: <1121676117.3336.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1121676117.3336.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <41147.139.1.44.13.1121677247.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> > Hi list, > > Is there a reason why clamav in contrib is only up to date for v2.0 of > classic? Yes, I have currently not enough time to support older releases. Gerald From mbak at fxnet.hu Mon Jul 18 04:15:45 2005 From: mbak at fxnet.hu (Mikael Bak) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] clamav in 1.1 contrib In-Reply-To: <41147.139.1.44.13.1121677247.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> References: <1121676117.3336.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41147.139.1.44.13.1121677247.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> Message-ID: <1121678144.3336.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 11:00, Gerald Dachs wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > Is there a reason why clamav in contrib is only up to date for v2.0 of > > classic? > > Yes, I have currently not enough time to support older releases. > Gerald, Thanks for the quick answer. Since classic 1.1 is advertised to be supported until the end of this year, I suggest that you next time assign someone else to pick up the support for such important package. Dropping support silently may be frustrating for some users depending on its functionality. Regards, Mikael From gda at tinysofa.org Mon Jul 18 05:06:06 2005 From: gda at tinysofa.org (Gerald Dachs) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] clamav in 1.1 contrib In-Reply-To: <1121678144.3336.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1121676117.3336.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41147.139.1.44.13.1121677247.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> <1121678144.3336.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <47703.139.1.44.13.1121681166.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 11:00, Gerald Dachs wrote: >> > Hi list, >> > >> > Is there a reason why clamav in contrib is only up to date for v2.0 of >> > classic? >> >> Yes, I have currently not enough time to support older releases. >> > > Gerald, > Thanks for the quick answer. > > Since classic 1.1 is advertised to be supported until the end of this > year, I suggest that you next time assign someone else to pick up the > support for such important package. Dropping support silently may be > frustrating for some users depending on its functionality. Nobody told that classic 1.1 is not supported anymore. Contrib is another thing and even here I didn't tell that it is not supported. I am not in the position to assign somebody else to any tasks. You talk about frustration, what about my frustration to keep up a big amount of contrib rpms for tcs and get only feedback if somebody don't like what I am doing. Most of the time it looks like I am doing it for my own (and for Jaakko). Remember please that I get not paid or honored for this work, so I took the freedom to work mainly for the version of tcs I use. Gerald From mbak at fxnet.hu Mon Jul 18 05:31:55 2005 From: mbak at fxnet.hu (Mikael Bak) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] clamav in 1.1 contrib In-Reply-To: <47703.139.1.44.13.1121681166.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> References: <1121676117.3336.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41147.139.1.44.13.1121677247.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> <1121678144.3336.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47703.139.1.44.13.1121681166.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> Message-ID: <1121682714.3336.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 12:06, Gerald Dachs wrote: > > > > Gerald, > > Thanks for the quick answer. > > > > Since classic 1.1 is advertised to be supported until the end of this > > year, I suggest that you next time assign someone else to pick up the > > support for such important package. Dropping support silently may be > > frustrating for some users depending on its functionality. > > Nobody told that classic 1.1 is not supported anymore. Contrib is another > thing and even here I didn't tell that it is not supported. > > I am not in the position to assign somebody else to any tasks. > > You talk about frustration, what about my frustration to keep up a > big amount of contrib rpms for tcs and get only feedback if somebody > don't like what I am doing. Most of the time it looks like I am doing > it for my own (and for Jaakko). Remember please that I get not paid or > honored for this work, so I took the freedom to work mainly for the > version of tcs I use. > Gerald, You must have completely missed my point. I did not in any way say that it was _bad_ from you to drop support for a package in contrib. The bad thing is not telling anybody about it. By assigning I ment: "Hey list! I'm not going to be able to support contrib packages for v1.1 anymore. If anyone's intrested in maintaining them, please tell me". When I said support for v1.1 of classic is ending by the end of the year I was referring to an email Jaakko sent to the list a while ago. I know that that does not have anything to do with contrib (officially). But many of us rely on contrib packages in order to have a the functionality we want. And let's face it: running a mail server today without clamav or similar is not a very good idea. Lastly, I wasn't complaining about "bad support" from you. I know nobody's getting paid for this. I was just asking for communication and cooperation in order to avoid misunderstandings and broken / not very safe servers out there. Telling us on the list that contrib packages aren't going to be updated isn't very much asked, I think. Kind regards, Mikael From gda at tinysofa.org Mon Jul 18 06:30:27 2005 From: gda at tinysofa.org (Gerald Dachs) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] clamav in 1.1 contrib In-Reply-To: <1121682714.3336.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1121676117.3336.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41147.139.1.44.13.1121677247.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> <1121678144.3336.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47703.139.1.44.13.1121681166.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> <1121682714.3336.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <42933.139.1.44.13.1121686227.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 12:06, Gerald Dachs wrote: >> > >> > Gerald, >> > Thanks for the quick answer. >> > >> > Since classic 1.1 is advertised to be supported until the end of this >> > year, I suggest that you next time assign someone else to pick up the >> > support for such important package. Dropping support silently may be >> > frustrating for some users depending on its functionality. >> >> Nobody told that classic 1.1 is not supported anymore. Contrib is >> another >> thing and even here I didn't tell that it is not supported. >> >> I am not in the position to assign somebody else to any tasks. >> >> You talk about frustration, what about my frustration to keep up a >> big amount of contrib rpms for tcs and get only feedback if somebody >> don't like what I am doing. Most of the time it looks like I am doing >> it for my own (and for Jaakko). Remember please that I get not paid or >> honored for this work, so I took the freedom to work mainly for the >> version of tcs I use. >> > > Gerald, > You must have completely missed my point. I don't think so. > I did not in any way say that it was _bad_ from you to drop support for > a package in contrib. The bad thing is not telling anybody about it. as I told, I didn't drop support. > By assigning I ment: "Hey list! I'm not going to be able to support > contrib packages for v1.1 anymore. If anyone's intrested in maintaining > them, please tell me". as I told, I am not in the position to tell this, I can't invite other developers. > When I said support for v1.1 of classic is ending by the end of the year > I was referring to an email Jaakko sent to the list a while ago. I know > that that does not have anything to do with contrib (officially). But > many of us rely on contrib packages in order to have a the functionality > we want. And let's face it: running a mail server today without clamav > or similar is not a very good idea. Okay, I see now that at least you have interest in a new version of clamav and maybe amavisd-new. At this time it would be really nice to read here in the list who else is using tcs 1.1 and what reason he has not to upgrade. Don't feel pressed, it is only out of curiousity. > Lastly, I wasn't complaining about "bad support" from you. I know > nobody's getting paid for this. I was just asking for communication and > cooperation in order to avoid misunderstandings and broken / not very > safe servers out there. Telling us on the list that contrib packages > aren't going to be updated isn't very much asked, I think. Again, I didn't say this. This conversation doesn't not motivate me very much, but I will upgrade the most important packages soon. Currently the relocation of the tinysofa servers is not finished, so I can't tell when it will happen. Gerald From mbak at fxnet.hu Mon Jul 18 06:47:09 2005 From: mbak at fxnet.hu (Mikael Bak) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] clamav in 1.1 contrib In-Reply-To: <42933.139.1.44.13.1121686227.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> References: <1121676117.3336.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41147.139.1.44.13.1121677247.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> <1121678144.3336.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47703.139.1.44.13.1121681166.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> <1121682714.3336.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42933.139.1.44.13.1121686227.squirrel@sohoserver.homelinux.net> Message-ID: <1121687229.3336.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:30, Gerald Dachs wrote: > Again, I didn't say this. > Gerald, Then I misunderstood you. I thought you said that you don't have time to mess with tcs1.1. I interpreted it as you were dropping support for it. My wrong, sorry! :-) > Okay, I see now that at least you have interest in a new version > of clamav and maybe amavisd-new. At this time it would be really > nice to read here in the list who else is using tcs 1.1 and what > reason he has not to upgrade. Don't feel pressed, it is only out > of curiousity. I don't know if you have noticed, but this is actually the first time I haven't made a clamav build myself. Mostly I have been needing it faster that contrib collection was updated. I have also always made my rpm packages available to anyone interested as well as posting the information on the list. So if I'm the last one using tcs1.1, then please don't bother. I can manage myself :-) My reson for not upgrading is that the server can only be taken down when _really_ neccessary. And since Jaakko announced support untill end of year, I haven't thought this "relly neccessary" time is here yet. Switching a production server os kernel from 2.4 to 2.6 alsa makes me at least a little scared :-) Just want to make sure everything is going to work until I switch. > This conversation doesn't not motivate me very much, but I will > upgrade the most important packages soon. Currently the relocation > of the tinysofa servers is not finished, so I can't tell when > it will happen. > Sorry to hear that. But most importantly this discussion doesn't lead us forward. Please take your time. It was never my intention to push new version out of you. I only wanted to know what I could expect from tcs1.1 contrib repository. And my only critisism was lack of communication. Nothing else. Kind regards, Mikael From mbak at fxnet.hu Mon Jul 18 08:14:34 2005 From: mbak at fxnet.hu (Mikael Bak) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] clamav 0.86.1 rpm for classic 1.1 Message-ID: <1121692473.3336.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi list, If anyone needs this for classic 1.1, then pick it up here: http://miba.fxnet.hu/tinysofa/ Mikael From Tony_Burger at circuitcity.com Wed Jul 20 13:50:55 2005 From: Tony_Burger at circuitcity.com (Tony_Burger@circuitcity.com) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] Postfix/Cyrus POP3 Message-ID: Folks, I have recently installed the latest version of the server. Prior to this I was using version 1.1. I was able to connect to the Cyrus POP3 pretty much "right out of the box" with some mods to the postfix main.cf file. After installing 2.0 and making similar mods to the main.cf, I can connect to the Cyrus POP3, but I can't seem to authenticate. Here is what I'm seeing: tonyb@[/etc]->telnet localhost 110 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. +OK mrt Cyrus POP3 v2.2.12 server ready <2272964974.1121885124@mrt> USER tonyb +OK Name is a valid mailbox PASS xxxxxxxx -ERR [AUTH] Invalid login Does anyone know how Cyrus authenticates the POP3 mailbox password? The password I'm using is the same as the shadow password for the tonyb account. Thanks From Tony_Burger at circuitcity.com Wed Jul 20 14:27:32 2005 From: Tony_Burger at circuitcity.com (Tony_Burger@circuitcity.com) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] Postfix/Cyrus POP3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Ok, I changed the /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd to shadow and the /etc/cyrus-imapd/imapd.conf sasl_pwcheck_method to saslauthd and I can now connect to the email account successfully. Next todo: get Microsoft Outlook from a PC on the local domain to receive mail from the cyrus POP3 account. I can get Outlook to login to the account and successfully send a message to the account, but it won't receive the mail in the account... Tony Burger x4311 Tony_Burger@circu itcity.com Sent by: To classic-discuss-b classic-discuss@tinysofa.org ounces@tinysofa.o cc rg Subject [classic-discuss] Postfix/Cyrus 07/20/05 02:50 PM POP3 Folks, I have recently installed the latest version of the server. Prior to this I was using version 1.1. I was able to connect to the Cyrus POP3 pretty much "right out of the box" with some mods to the postfix main.cf file. After installing 2.0 and making similar mods to the main.cf, I can connect to the Cyrus POP3, but I can't seem to authenticate. Here is what I'm seeing: tonyb@[/etc]->telnet localhost 110 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. +OK mrt Cyrus POP3 v2.2.12 server ready <2272964974.1121885124@mrt> USER tonyb +OK Name is a valid mailbox PASS xxxxxxxx -ERR [AUTH] Invalid login Does anyone know how Cyrus authenticates the POP3 mailbox password? The password I'm using is the same as the shadow password for the tonyb account. Thanks _______________________________________________ classic-discuss mailing list classic-discuss@tinysofa.org http://lists.tinysofa.org/mailman/listinfo/classic-discuss From gda at tinysofa.org Wed Jul 20 15:07:56 2005 From: gda at tinysofa.org (Gerald Dachs) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] Postfix/Cyrus POP3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20050720220756.1ffa2dba.gda@tinysofa.org> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:27:32 -0400 Tony_Burger@circuitcity.com wrote: > > Ok, I changed the /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd to shadow and the I use SASL_AUTHMECH=pam, but if it works so why not > Next todo: get Microsoft Outlook from a PC on the local domain to receive > mail from the cyrus POP3 account. I can get Outlook to login to the > account and successfully send a message to the account, but it won't > receive the mail in the account... What did you change in /etc/postfix/main.cf? I don't understand why you use POP3 instead of IMAP. Gerald -- Gerald Dachs gda@tinysofa.org From Tony_Burger at circuitcity.com Wed Jul 20 15:38:59 2005 From: Tony_Burger at circuitcity.com (Tony_Burger@circuitcity.com) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] Postfix/Cyrus POP3 In-Reply-To: <20050720220756.1ffa2dba.gda@tinysofa.org> Message-ID: I realized the /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd change didn't effect the POP3 authentication. I changed it back to pam and the POP3 authen still worked. The /etc/cyrus-imapd/imapd.conf change seems to effect the authen. The main.cf changes were minimal....domain/inet_interfaces stuff I guess I've never tried to create an IMAP account. I can login to the IMAP server via telnet localhost 143 and login with the same credentials as the POP3 account. When I send a message from the Outlook IMAP account the message ends up in /home/tonyb/Maildir/new. I can't get the Outlook IMAP account to the read the mail in this location. Is this the correct location for mail? Tony Burger x4311 Gerald Dachs To Sent by: classic-discuss@tinysofa.org classic-discuss-b cc ounces@tinysofa.o rg Subject Re: [classic-discuss] Postfix/Cyrus POP3 07/20/05 04:07 PM On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:27:32 -0400 Tony_Burger@circuitcity.com wrote: > > Ok, I changed the /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd to shadow and the I use SASL_AUTHMECH=pam, but if it works so why not > Next todo: get Microsoft Outlook from a PC on the local domain to receive > mail from the cyrus POP3 account. I can get Outlook to login to the > account and successfully send a message to the account, but it won't > receive the mail in the account... What did you change in /etc/postfix/main.cf? I don't understand why you use POP3 instead of IMAP. Gerald -- Gerald Dachs gda@tinysofa.org _______________________________________________ classic-discuss mailing list classic-discuss@tinysofa.org http://lists.tinysofa.org/mailman/listinfo/classic-discuss From gda at tinysofa.org Wed Jul 20 16:34:32 2005 From: gda at tinysofa.org (Gerald Dachs) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] Postfix/Cyrus POP3 In-Reply-To: References: <20050720220756.1ffa2dba.gda@tinysofa.org> Message-ID: <20050720233432.69a23d80.gda@tinysofa.org> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:38:59 -0400 Tony_Burger@circuitcity.com wrote: > The main.cf changes were minimal....domain/inet_interfaces stuff > > I guess I've never tried to create an IMAP account. I can login to the > IMAP server via telnet localhost 143 and login with the same credentials as > the POP3 account. When I send a message from the Outlook IMAP account the > message ends up in /home/tonyb/Maildir/new. That means your changes of the main.cf are not enough, you have to tell postfix to deliver the mails to cyrus, because cyrus doesn't use Maildirs. This was the reason I asked you for your changes in main.cf. > I can't get the Outlook IMAP > account to the read the mail in this location. Is this the correct > location for mail? An imap client reads from an imap server not a location on the server. You don't get mails, because the server didn't get them. In the moment you have told postfix how to deliver to cyrus, you will see the mails in your mail client that you hopefully will replace with thunderbird soon. If you would decide to install additional amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav from contrib I could help you with my postfix setup. I could show you how to setup server side sorting in folder with a web frontend too. Gerald -- Gerald Dachs gda@tinysofa.org From Tony_Burger at circuitcity.com Wed Jul 20 17:29:08 2005 From: Tony_Burger at circuitcity.com (Tony_Burger@circuitcity.com) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] Postfix/Cyrus POP3 In-Reply-To: <20050720233432.69a23d80.gda@tinysofa.org> Message-ID: The change to mailbox_transport in postfix/main.cf fixed the problem. Outlook now sends/accepts mail using the IMAP/POP3 Cyrus server. Thanks! Tony Burger x4311 Gerald Dachs To Sent by: classic-discuss@tinysofa.org classic-discuss-b cc ounces@tinysofa.o rg Subject Re: [classic-discuss] Postfix/Cyrus POP3 07/20/05 05:34 PM On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:38:59 -0400 Tony_Burger@circuitcity.com wrote: > The main.cf changes were minimal....domain/inet_interfaces stuff > > I guess I've never tried to create an IMAP account. I can login to the > IMAP server via telnet localhost 143 and login with the same credentials as > the POP3 account. When I send a message from the Outlook IMAP account the > message ends up in /home/tonyb/Maildir/new. That means your changes of the main.cf are not enough, you have to tell postfix to deliver the mails to cyrus, because cyrus doesn't use Maildirs. This was the reason I asked you for your changes in main.cf. > I can't get the Outlook IMAP > account to the read the mail in this location. Is this the correct > location for mail? An imap client reads from an imap server not a location on the server. You don't get mails, because the server didn't get them. In the moment you have told postfix how to deliver to cyrus, you will see the mails in your mail client that you hopefully will replace with thunderbird soon. If you would decide to install additional amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav from contrib I could help you with my postfix setup. I could show you how to setup server side sorting in folder with a web frontend too. Gerald -- Gerald Dachs gda@tinysofa.org _______________________________________________ classic-discuss mailing list classic-discuss@tinysofa.org http://lists.tinysofa.org/mailman/listinfo/classic-discuss From mbak at fxnet.hu Mon Jul 25 02:05:39 2005 From: mbak at fxnet.hu (Mikael Bak) Date: Sun May 4 12:28:01 2008 Subject: [classic-discuss] clamav 0.86.2 rpm for classic 1.1 Message-ID: <1122275139.3337.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi list, Updated clamav package for classic 1.1 can be downloaded from here: http://miba.fxnet.hu/tinysofa/ Mikael